Loveland Bike Trail
 

MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

 

 

Monday, September 13, 2010

 

 

LAND USE HEARING

 

The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 3:00 p.m. with Matt Lafferty, Principal Planner. Chair Johnson presided and Commissioners Gaiter and Donnelly were present. Also present were:  Rob Helmick, Toby Stauffer, and Sean Wheeler, Planning Department; Tracy Shambo, Engineering Department; Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Department; Jeannine Haag, Assistant County Attorney; and Gael Cookman, Deputy Clerk.

 

Chair Johnson opened the hearing with the Pledge of Allegiance and asked for public comment on the Land Use Code and County Budget.  No one from the audience addressed the Board regarding these topics.  

 

Chair Johnson explained that items 1 – 4 are on the consent agenda and would not be discussed unless requested by the Board, staff, or members of the audience:

 

 

1.   COUNTY ROAD 29 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION, FILE #10-S2981:  This is a request to vacate a portion of County Road 29 along the property of Jerry and Tracey Chevalier. The area to be vacated is approximately .01 acres.  The purpose for this request is to accommodate an addition to an existing garage.

                       

The property is constrained by County Road 29 and the Home Supply ditch which surrounds the property on three sides. The paved lanes of County Road 29 in this area are generally located outside of the road right of way.  For the garage addition, the applicant has been approved for a variance from the required 70’ road setback, file # 10-BOA0809, heard by the Board of Adjustment on 8/24/10.

 

This application was forwarded to the appropriate departments and agencies for comment.  The responses from these groups indicate that there are no other issues of concern. 

 

 

The Development Services Team finds that the application meets the criteria for a right-of-way vacation, the proposed request will not leave any land without access and all of the comments from the review agencies have been considered.

 

The Development Services Team recommends approval of the County Road 29 Right-of-Way Vacation, File # 10-S2981, a request to vacate a portion of County Road 29 Right-of-Way along the south boundary of the Chevalier property containing 804 sq. ft. or 0.01 acres more or less, see exhibit and description.

 

 

2.  FRONT RANGE VET CLINIC SPECIAL REVIEW, FILE #10-Z1792:   The applicant owns a veterinary clinic on East Mulberry and currently provides medical treatment, grooming services and indoor boarding for dogs at his facility.  This use is legal and approved under previous regulations to operate as a veterinary hospital.  For this request, he is asking for approval for a Pet Animal Facility that includes an outdoor use area for dogs.  The Land Use Code requires that any Pet Animal Facility that wishes to have an outdoor use area for dogs must process a Special Review request.  The applicant proposes to modify his existing structure to allow dogs to have outdoor access. 

 

The application was on the consent agenda for the August 18, 2010 Planning Commission.  After a brief presentation, the Planning Commission voted without amendment to the Staff recommendations.  The applicant was present, but did not testify to raise concerns.

 

The Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Commissioners that the Front Range Vet Clinic Special Review, file #10-Z1792, for the property described on “Exhibit A” to the minutes, be approved with the following conditions:

 

1.   This Special Review approval shall automatically expire without a public hearing if the use is not commenced within three years of the date of approval.  The Site shall be developed consistent with the approved plan and with the information contained in the Front Range Veterinary Clinic Special Review, File #10-Z1792, except as modified by the conditions of approval or agreement of the County and applicant.  The applicant shall be subject to all other verbal or written representations and commitments of record for the Front Range Veterinary Clinic.

2.   Failure to comply with any conditions of the Special Review approval may result in reconsideration of the use and possible revocation of the approval by the Board of Commissioners.

3.   This application is approved without the requirement for a Development Agreement.  In lieu of a Development Agreement, the Findings and Resolution shall be a servitude running with the Property.  Those owners of the Property or any portion of the Property who obtain title subsequent to the date of recording of the Findings and Resolution, their heirs, successors, assigns or transferees, and persons holding under applicants shall comply with the terms and conditions of the Special Review approval.

4.   In the event the applicant fails to comply with any conditions of approval or otherwise fails to use the property consistent with the approved Special Review, applicant agrees that in addition to all other remedies available to County, County may withhold building permits, issue a written notice to applicant to appear and show cause why the Special Review approval should not be revoked, and/or bring a court action for enforcement of the terms of the Special Review.  All remedies are cumulative and the County’s election to use one shall not preclude use of another.  In the event County must retain legal counsel and/or pursue a court action to enforce the terms of this Special Review approval, applicant agrees to pay all expenses incurred by County including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees.

5.   County may conduct periodic inspections to the property and reviews of the status of the Special Review as appropriate to monitor and enforce the terms of the Special Review approval.

6.   At time of building permit application, the owner is responsible for obtaining all required building permits for the modifications to existing structures and for new structures related to the Front Range Veterinary Clinic.  All applicable fees, including permit fees, the Transportation Capital Expansion Fees and the Boxelder Drainage Basin fees, shall apply to this use.  The Transportation Capital Expansion Fee and the Boxelder Drainage Basin fee shall be paid when application is made for the new kennel structure for the Front Range Veterinary Clinic.

7.   Site Plan Review and approval by Larimer County is required prior to the addition of any new structures on the property, subject to the requirements in Section 6 of the Land Use Code.

8.   Approval of the Site Plan will require connection of the site to the public sanitary sewer system, and the provision of a Deed of Dedication for rights-of-way subject to the requirements of the Colorado Department of Transportation at the time of Site Plan approval.

9.   The use is subject to the requirements of the Larimer County Noise Ordinance.  In the event valid noise complaints are received by the County, the kennel operation will convert to an indoor facility with only supervised outdoor canine activities allowed.  The indoor facility will need to be fitted with adequate heating and air conditioning equipment to allow operation with closed doors and windows.

10  The applicant shall provide a plan for screening the outdoor use area per the requirements in Section 8.5 of the Land Use Code within three years of the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, or as part of the Site Plan approval, whichever should come first.

11. Within six months of the date of public hearing approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicant shall provide a signed agreement with the Lake Canal Reservoir Company regarding requirements for development of the site in relation to the irrigation ditch.  In the event the applicant is unable to reach agreement with the Ditch Company, he may request Board of County Commissioner approval for alteration of this condition.  The request to modify this condition of approval must be made within six months of the date of the public hearing with the Board of County Commissioners.

12. Within six months of the date of the public hearing approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicant will provide a copy of a signed Agreement to Annex with the City of Fort Collins.

 

 

3.  MIDORI PLANNED LAND DEVELOPMENT/PLANNED DIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT TIME EXTENSION, FILE #08-S2820:  In 2009, the Midori Planned Land Division, Planned Development (PLD/PD) received Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide 4.099 acres into 11 lots for single-family residential uses.

 

The subject property is Located on the west side of North Taft Hill Road, south of the Saddleback & Solar Ridge Subdivisions and northwest of Fort Collins.  The site is inside the Fort Collins GMA and subject to the Northwest Sub-Area Plan.  The development would be served by the City of Fort Collins water and sanitary sewer.  There is an existing single-family home on the site.  On 05-20-2009 the Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the Preliminary Plat, and the Board of County Commissioners granted approval for the project on 07-06-2009.

 

Approval of the Final Plat for this project has not been realized largely due to economic conditions.  On July 15, 2010, the applicant contacted Planning Staff to request a withdrawal of the Final Plat and to extend approval of the Preliminary Plat.  If the extension of the Preliminary Plat is granted, the Final Plat application will be withdrawn and resubmitted within a prescribed time (2 years) for re-evaluation.  Staff recognizes the current difficulties resulting form the economic environment.  The property owner has committed time and resources to this development request, which provides justification for approval of the extension.  Staff further acknowledges that the current Final Plat materials have been through review.  Accordingly the follow-up application within two years should not warrant a full review or full payment of the application fee.  Staff supports a reduction to ½ the application fee for the re-submittal of the Final Plat.

 

The Development Services Team recommends approval of a two year extension of the Preliminary Plat, and a request to pay ½ the Final Plat submittal fee for the Midori PLD PD as described in File #08-S2820.  The above shall be subject to the following conditions:

 

1.   All conditions outlined in the Findings and Resolution approving the Midori PLD PD Preliminary Plat signed on April 14, 2009 and recorded at Reception No. 2009-0056422 shall continue to apply.

2.   The Final Plat for the Midori PLD PD shall be submitted no later that September 30, 2012 or this Preliminary Plat time extension approval shall automatically expire without a public hearing.

3.   At the time of final plat submittal the applicant shall pay an application fee of ½ the amount of the Final Plat fee in place at the time the application is made.

 

4.    PELPHREY MINOR SPECIAL REVIEW AND APPEAL, FILE #10-Z1808:   The applicant’s seek Minor Special Review approval for an Accessory Living Area (ALA) in a detached garage.  The only exterior modification for the ALA will be an outside entry door.  All other improvements will be made inside to the loft area as living space.  The site is a 35.8-acre residential lot located west of Berthoud on the north side of County Road 8E.  Under the current regulations, the size of an ALA is limited to 800 square feet or no more than 40% of the primary residence, whichever is less.  Because the proposed finished loft will be 992 square feet in size the applicants have appealed the space limits of Section 4.3.10.F.2.c of the Land Use Code.  The neighborhood surrounding the site is made up of various sized single-family residential lots.  The site and the surrounding area are zoned FA-Farming.  The applicants held the required neighborhood meeting on April 23, 2010, but none of the individuals notified attended the meeting.  In addition, Staff has not received any concerns in writing or by email, and none of the reviewing agencies raised objections to approval of this request. 

 

Planning Staff support the Minor Special Review use for the Accessory Living Area and the appeal to the size limitation.  The County Engineering and Health Departments also reviewed the request and support approval.   The Engineering Department notes that the applicant will need to pay the Transportation Capital Expansion Fee, but did not indicate any other concerns.  Payment of all applicable fees is recommended as a condition of approval below.  The Health Department’s one concern relates to the provision of water.  In answer to that question, the Little Thompson Water District provided a comment that their only requirement is the applicant must pay a $100 fee for a water tap to supply the Accessory Living Area.  Otherwise the Water District did not indicate a concern with being able to supply water to the use.  There are no other items of concern.

The County Lead Plans Examiner provided comments that describe building permit requirements if the use is approved.  The Building Department did not indicate any concerns with the applicant’s ability to meet these requirements. 

 

The County’s Code Compliance Supervisor provided comments regarding outstanding building permits and inspections, along with building permits for the proposed use.  For health and safety reasons, all outstanding permits and inspections should be brought up to date, which is a recommended condition of approval below.

 

The Berthoud Fire District recommends, but does not require that the remodel plans include an interior sprinkler system and monitored fire alarm for safety purposes.  As noted in the comments from the Commercial Plans Examiner, the Building Code requires smoke and carbon monoxide detectors.  Staff recommends the applicant consider the Fire District’s other recommendations as part of the remodel plans. 

 

Accessory Living Areas are intended to allow property owners the full benefit and use of their land, while maintaining the integrity and character of the single-family lot.  The proposed ALA will be inside of an existing garage, with minimal external modifications required.  The request is compatible with existing and allowed uses in the Land Use Code and the intent and requirements of the County’s Master Plan.  The applicants are advised that approval will require them to obtain a building permit and that other fees (such as the transportation capital expansion fee and the Little Thompson Water Tap fee) apply.  The Development Services Team does not anticipate any difficulties in these areas.  This request meets the requirements and intent of the Larimer County Land Use Code for both the Minor Special Review and the Appeal.

 

The Development Services Team findings are as follows:

 

1.   The proposed use is compatible with existing and allowed uses in the surrounding area and shall be in harmony with the neighborhood.  The detached Accessory Living Area shall be for the use of family or friends.  Approval of the request and the appeal is not anticipated to have any impacts on other property.

2.   The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Larimer County Master Plan as required by the Land Use Code.  Subject to the size limitation being approved, there are no conflicts evident with the requirements of the Land Use Code, including Section 4.3 10.F.2 (Accessory Living Area in a Detached Building).

3.   The recommendations of referral agencies have been considered.

4.   Approval of the appeal will not subvert the purpose of the standard or requirements for the Land Use Code and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or property values in the neighborhood.  Approval of the appeal is also the minimum action necessary, and will not result in increased costs to the general public.

 

The Development Services Team recommends approval of the Pelphrey Accessory Living Area Minor Special Review, File # 10-Z1808 and the appeal to Section 4.3.10.F.2.c, subject to the following conditions:

1.   The Site shall be developed consistent with the approved plan and information contained in the Pelphrey Accessory Living Area Minor Special Review, File # 10-Z1808, except as modified by the conditions of approval or agreement of the County and applicant.  The application is subject to all other verbal or written representations and commitments of record for the Pelphrey Accessory Living Area Minor Special Review, File #10-Z1808.

2.   This application is approved without the requirement for a Development Agreement.  In the event the applicant fails to comply with any conditions of approval, or fails to use the property consistent with the approved Minor Special Review the applicant agrees that, in addition to all other remedies available to County, the County may withhold building permits; issue a written notice to applicant to appear and show cause why the Minor Special Review approval should not be revoked; and / or bring a court action for enforcement of the terms of the Minor Special Review.  All remedies are cumulative and the County’s election to use one shall not preclude use of another.  In the event County must retain legal counsel and / or pursue a court action to enforce the terms of this Minor Special Review approval, applicant agrees to pay all expenses incurred by County including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees.  County may conduct periodic inspections to the property and reviews of the status of the Minor Special Review as appropriate to monitor and enforce the terms of the Minor Special Review approval.

3.   The Findings and Resolution shall be a servitude running with the Property.  Those owners of the Property (or any portion of the Property) who obtain title subsequent to the date of recording of the Findings and Resolution, their heirs, successors, assigns or transferees and persons holding under applicants, shall comply with the terms and conditions of the Special Review approval.

4.   The owner is responsible for obtaining all required building permits for the Pelphrey  Accessory Living Area.  All applicable fees, including permit fees and Transportation Capital Expansion Fees shall apply to this use and shall be paid no later than May 31, 2011.

 

5.   Within 90 days from the date of the public hearing, the owner shall obtain all outstanding the outstanding building permits and inspections for all previous work in the existing garage and residence.

 

6.   Within 90 days from the date of the public hearing, the owner shall provide evidence of payment to the Little Thompson Water District the fee in the amount of $100.00.

 

7.   The square footage in the Accessory Living Area shall not exceed 992 square feet.

 

8.   This Minor Special Review and Appeal approvals will automatically expire without a public hearing if the use is not commenced within three years of the date of approval.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consent agenda, as outlined above.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

5.  BOXBERGER REZONING CLARIFICATION, FILE #10-Z1814:  The applicants propose to clarify the zoning on this parcel.  This site was originally zoned FA-1 in the 1963 zoning.  In 1975 the a zoning change (file #6-75) was approved by the Board of County Commissioners for C-Commercial and I-Industrial zoning.  This zoning remained in place until another change was proposed in 1986.  This was associated with a proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the zoning included a number of conditions attached, including completion of the PUD.  Many of those conditions were not met and the PUD expired after three years in 1989.  The applicants proposed clarification is to revert the zoning to the 1975 C and I.

 

There are no specific review criteria for the clarification of a previous zoning action.  It was the practice at the time, in the 1980’s to approve zoning conditional upon the filing of a plat or PUD plan.  The zoning change however was reflected in the Findings and Resolution and the maps were changed to reflect the “conditional zoning”.  This has created confusion and difficulty for the property owners, in so far as there are conditions to be met, based on regulations and conditions which have changed over time and are no longer relevant to the site.  A reasonable solution is to “revert” the zoning to the zoning which existed before the prior action.  This is what the applicant proposes and the Team supports.  As a note because of just these kinds of concerns the current practice on rezoning is to not approve or file the change until conditions have been met. 

 

The Development Services Team recommends Approval of the Boxberger Rezoning Clarification file# 10-Z1814 to revert the zoning of the property back to the C and zoning approved with file # 6-75.

 

Mr. Helmick briefly described the application as outlined above and requested Board approval on the same.

Lucia Liley, representing the applicant, stated that they had no immediate development plans, but wish to clarify the underlying zoning so they could move forward in the future.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Boxberger Rezoning Clarification file# 10-Z1814.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

The hearing adjourned at 3:10 p.m.

 

 

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

 

The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. with Frank Lancaster, County Manager. Chair Johnson presided, and Commissioners Gaiter and Donnelly were present. Also present were:  Gary Darling, Donna Hart, and Deni LaRue, Commissioners’ Office; Linda Hoffman, and Michael Whitley, Planning Department; George Hass, Jeannine Haag, and Bill Ressue County Attorney’s Office; and Gael Cookman, Deputy Clerk. 

 

1.   PUBLIC COMMENT:  The following people addressed the Board regarding Medical Marijuana centers:  Jim and Sue Bramley, Erica and Brian Freeman, Sally and Seth Gustin, Robert Walker, Peter Verechick, Scott Stokely, Jerry Ushbaugh, Jason Specht, Jeremiah Larson.  They supporting the centers and requesting that those who have already applied to become a Medical Marijuana center, be allowed to continue through the Special Review process.

 

Jason Trevena spoke in opposition the Medical Marijuana Centers, stating that in his opinion, they create a negative impact to the surrounding neighborhoods.

 

2.    APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2010: 

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the minutes for the week of September 6, 2010, as presented.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

3.    REVIEW OF THE SCHEDULE FOR THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2010:   Ms. Hart reviewed the upcoming schedule with the Board.

 

4.     CONSENT AGENDA:

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consent agenda, as listed below:

 

PETITIONS FOR ABATEMENT:  As recommended by the County Assessor, the following Petitions for Abatement are approved:  Matthew and Michaela Horner; Rodney and Rebecca Arthur; and Airgas Intermountain, Inc.

 

09142010A001           DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. 8061 – GUARDRAIL INSTALLATION ON COUNTY ROADS 27 AND 74E, BY AND BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND DOUBLE D CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

 

09142010R002           FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANT FAMILY FARMS APPEAL

 

MISCELLANEOUS:   Annual Compliance Certification Report & Monitoring and Permit Deviation Report for Larimer County Landfill; Larimer County Core Services Program Grant Proposal for Expansion of Services to Adolescents; Larimer County Core Services Program – Three Year Plan 2011-2013; and Annual State Chafee Plan.

 

LIQUOR LICENSES:  The following licenses were approved and/or issued:  Castillon’s Mexican Restaurant – Hotel & Restaurant – Fort Collins; Colorado Feed & Grain Cookhouse – Change of Corporate Structure – Fort Collins; FOCO Girls Gone Derby Booster Club – Special Event 3.2% - Fort Collins.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

5.    ALARM ORDINANCE, 2ND READING, AND PUBLIC COMMENT:  Mr. Lancaster explained that a 2nd Reading must take place for an ordinance to take effect.  There was no public comment on this item and the following action was taken:

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the amendments to the Security Alarm Ordinance.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

09142010O001  SECURITY ALARM ORDINANCE

 

6.   PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTY IN VENNER RANCH GID #18: 

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners open the meeting as a Public Hearing.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

Ms. Sanders presented a petition from Robert and Ellen Dern requested that they be included in the Venner Ranch GID #18.  She stated that notice of this hearing was sent to all property owners in the district and published in the Estes Park Trail Gazette.  There was no public comment on this item.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the resolution approving the inclusion of the Dern Property, in Venner Ranch GID #18.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

09142010R001           RESOLUTION APPROVING INCLUSION OF PROPERTY IN VENNER RANCH GID #18

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners close the Public Hearing, and resume Administrative Matters.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

7.  CONSIDER A REQUEST TO UTILIZE THE TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR HORSE REGULATIONS VS. SPECIAL REVIEW:  Mr. Helmick explained the background and requested direction on whether Mr. Beckers should use the Special Review process of or the Transition Program for his horse operations.  Commissioner Gaiter supported the use of the Transition Program for this applicant, as this is what it was created for.  Commissioner Donnelly stated his opinion that it would be more beneficial for the applicant to use the Special Review process, as the Planning Commission will have helpful input this matter; Chair Johnson agreed.   

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners deny the request by Mr. Beckers to terminate his required Special Review application and allow him to purse review and approval of the use through the Transition Program for Equestrian Businesses. 

 

Motion carried 2-1; Commissioner Gaiter dissenting.

 

8.   RECEIVE DIRECTION ON PENDING FLOODPLAIN REGULATION CHANGES BY FORT COLLINS AND THE STATE OF COLORADO:  Mr. Peterson asked if the Board wished to have an additional work session regarding the pending floodplain regulation changes to go over the topics in more detail.  Consensus of the Board was to schedule a work session regarding this issue. 

 

9.  COUNTY MANAGER WORKSESSION:  Mr. Lancaster presented a request from the Sheriff to enact a fire ban, which would ban all open fires, all contained open fires, and all fireworks.   Discussion ensued and the Board directed Mr. Lancaster to ask the Sheriff if the ban on contained open fires was really necessary.    Mr. Lancaster conferred with the Sheriff and he agreed that the contained open fire ban was not essential.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Fire Ban Resolution, and ban all open fires and the use of fireworks, beginning at noon September 14, 2010, and expiring on November 1, 2010.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

09142020R004           RESOLUTION DECLARING FIRE RESTRICTIONS IN LARIMER COUNTY

 

10.   COMMISSIONER ACTIVITY REPORTS:   The Board discussed their activities at events during the past week, during which, Commissioner Gaiter presented a resolution for the Board to consider, regarding opposing Proposition 102.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioner approve the resolution opposing ballot measure Proposition 102.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

09142010R003           RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSITION 102

 

9.  LEGAL MATTERS:   Mr. Ayraud requested that the Board go into Executive Session for legal advice to discuss negotiations related to Red Mountain Open Space, and a personnel issue. 

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice on special legal questions, as outlined in 24-6-402(4)(b) C.R.S.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

The Board came out of Executive Session and the Chair Johnson stated that they are directing the County Attorney to draft a resolution enacting a ban on Medical Marijuana Centers in Larimer County; and to include language in the resolution that allows applicants that applied prior to July 2, 2010, to be exempt from the ban, and allow those applications to proceed through the process and be judged fairly on their merits.

 

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:30 p.m.

 

 

 

 

__________________________________________

  STEVE JOHNSON, CHAIR

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

 

 

SCOTT DOYLE

CLERK AND RECORDER

 

ATTEST:

 

______________________________________

Gael M. Cookman, Deputy County Clerk

Background Image: Loveland Bike Trail by Sharon Veit. All rights reserved.