Elk in Rocky Mountain National Park
 
> Meetings & Minutes > Commissioners' Minutes > BCC Minutes for 03/15/10  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

 

 

MONDAY, MARCH 15, 2010

 

LAND USE HEARING

 

The Board of County Commissioners met at 3:00 p.m. with Matt Lafferty, Principal Planner.  Chair Pro-Tem Donnelly presided and Commissioner Gaiter was present. Also present were:  Eric Tracy and Traci Shambo, Engineering Department; Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Department; Toby Stauffer and Michael Whitley, Planning Department; Jeannine Haag, County Attorney’s Office; and Melissa Lohry, Deputy Clerk.

 

Chair Pro-Tem Donnelly opened the hearing with the Pledge of Allegiance and asked for public comment on the Land Use Code and County Budget. No one from the audience addressed the Board regarding these topics.

 

Chair Pro-Tem Donnelly noted the following items were on the consent agenda and would not be discussed unless requested by the Board, staff, or members of the audience:

 

1.         CRAWFORD ACRES LOTS 16 & 17 AMENDED PLAT AND SUNRISE COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION, FILE #10-S2938:  This is a request to amend the plat of Crawford Acres to vacate the Sunrise Court right-of-way. The vacated property will be added to adjacent lots, 16 and 17.

 

Staff’s review has found that the proposed plat amendment will not adversely affect any neighboring properties or county agency, nor will it result in any additional lots; therefore, staff finds that the request meets the requirements of the Larimer County Land Use Code.

 

Staff recommends approval of the Amended Plat of Lots 16 & 17, Crawford Acres and Sunrise Court Right-of-Way Vacation, file #10-S2938, subject to the following conditions (and authorization for the chair to sign the plat when the conditions are met and the plat is presented for signature):

 

1.         The final plat shall be recorded by September 15, 2010, or this approval shall be null and void.

 

2.         Prior to the recordation of the final plat, the applicant shall make the technical corrections requested by the Land Surveyor of the Larimer County Engineering Department.

 

3.         The applicant shall place a note on the amended plat indicating that the resultant lots will be subject to the same restrictions, covenants, and conditions as set forth in the plat of record for the Crawford Acres Subdivision. 

 

4.         A 14-foot utility and pedestrian access easement will be shown on the final plat.

 

 

2.         CEDAR SPRINGS 4TH FILILNG LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 2, LOT CONSOLIDATION, FILE #10-S2939:  This is a request to combine two adjacent lots (Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, of the Cedar Springs 4 th  Filing) into one lot and vacate a 10-foot utility easement along the common lot line. Presently, there are no existing structures on the site. 

 

Staff has found that this request will not adversely affect any neighboring properties or any county agency, nor will it result in any additional lots; therefore, staff finds that the request meets the requirements of the Larimer County Land Use Code.

 

Staff recommends approval of the Cedar Springs 4 th Filing (Lots 3 & 4, Block 2) Lot Consolidation and 10-foot Utility Easement Vacation, file #10-S2939, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.         All conditions of approval shall be met and the final resolution recorded by September 15, 2010, or this approval shall be null and void.

 

2.         The resultant lot is subject to any and all covenants, deed restrictions, or other conditions that apply to the original lots.

 

3.         The vacation of the utility easement and the reconfiguration of the lots lines shall be finalized at such time when the plat and findings and resolution of the County Commissioners are recorded.

 

3.         HIAWATHA HEIGHTS LOTS 8 & 9, BLOCK 20, AMENDED PLAT, FILE #10-S2940:   This is a request to amend the plat of Hiawatha Heights to combine two lots and add an adjacent unplatted piece of land to the property, due to the current residence being located on the unplatted piece of land.

 

Staff has found that this request will not adversely affect any neighboring properties or any county agency, nor will it result in any additional lots; therefore, staff finds that the request meets the requirements of the Larimer County Land Use Code.

 

Staff recommends approval of the Amended Plat of Lots 8 & 9, Block 20, Hiawatha Heights Subdivision, file #10-S2940, subject to the following conditions (and authorization for the chair to sign the plat when the conditions are met and the plat is presented for signature):

 

1.         The final plat shall be recorded by September 15, 2010, or this approval shall be null and void.

 

2.         Prior to the recordation of the final plat, the applicant shall make the technical corrections requested by the Land Surveyor of the Larimer County Engineering Department.

 

4.         HERERRA SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT AND APPEALS, FILE #09-S2900:   This is a request for approval of a three lot subdivision encompassing 9.5-acres to reconfigure the lot lines of three parcels. Two of the parcels contain single-family homes built in 2004. The western lot is approximately 60-feet wide and is not suitable for development in it’s current configuration. The proposed subdivision would rearrange the lot lines to create a lot that would be suitable for the development of a single-family home.

 

The land to the north, west, and east of the proposed subdivision was annexed to the City of Johnstown in 2008. Prior to the annexation, the land within the proposed subdivision was part of parcels that were 35-acres in size or larger. The majority of the land within the parcels was annexed to Johnstown in 2008, leaving the existing parcels in their current configuration in unincorporated Larimer County. 

 

The property is north of County Road 14 which is also the Larimer/Weld County border.  Properties south of County Road 14 are located in either unincorporated Weld County or within the municipal limits of Johnstown.

 

If a well or septic system is utilized on the property, the minimum lot size in the FA – Farming zoning district is 2.3-acres. The subject property is served by the Little Thompson Water District but the existing residences utilize on-site septic systems and a septic system is proposed for the additional home.

 

The current lot sizes (west to east) are approximately 0.7-acres, 2.69-acres, and 6.0-acres. The proposed lot sizes, after reconfiguration, are 2.537-acres, 2.548-acres, and 4.083-acres. The proposed subdivision would also dedicate 0.333-acres of additional right-of-way for County Road 14. 

 

The two existing residences share a single gravel driveway onto County Road 14 and the home on the third lot is proposed to gain access to County Road 14 via the same driveway, which would be improved to be a cul-de-sac to meet the Larimer County Rural Area Road Standards. Sections 8.14.2.N of the Land Use Code would require the dedication of public right-of-way for the cul-de-sac and Section 8.14.2.S would require that the road provide connectivity to adjacent property. The applicant has requested appeals to the right-of-way and connectivity standards. 

 

There is a concrete lined irrigation ditch on the northern and eastern boundary of the subdivision and there are no identified floodways, floodplains, wetlands or wildlife habitats on the property; therefore, the property is identified as having a low geologic hazard.

 

In their review of the application, staff has found that the applicant has requested appeals to Sections 8.14.2.N and 8.14.2.S of the Larimer County Land Use Code to allow for the development of a private road that does not provide connectivity to adjacent property. 

 

In regards to the appeal of Section 8.14.2.N, staff found that the property within the proposed subdivision is surrounded by land within the town of Johnstown and is zoned to allow a variety of housing densities, including multi-family development and commercial development. The surrounding property will likely be developed at a different density than the subject property and may contain uses other than single-family residential.

 

The master plan for the town of Johnstown indicates a collector road connecting to County Road 14 just east of the subject property. County Road 14 is classified as a major collector and it would be more appropriate for surrounding properties to gain access to County Road 14 from that future collector than through a local road serving three single-family homes. There would be no public benefit to having the road within this subdivision be in a public right-of-way and Johnstown has indicated that they do not object to the proposed cul-de-sac’s lack of connectivity. The Development Services Team supports the proposed appeal.

 

Based on the overall review of this project, staff recommends the approval of the Herrera Subdivision, file #09-S2900, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.         The final plat shall be consistent with the approved preliminary plan and with the information contained in the Herrera Subdivision, file #09-S2900, except as modified by the conditions of approval or agreement of the county and applicant.  The applicant shall be subject to all other verbal or written representations and commitments of record for the Herrera Subdivision.

 

2.         The following fees shall be collected at building permit issuance for new single family dwellings:  Johnstown School Fee, Larimer County fees for County and Regional Transportation Capital Expansion, Larimer County Regional Park Fees (in lieu of dedication) and drainage fees.  The fee amount that is current at the time of building permit application shall apply. 

 

3.         All new habitable structures shall protected with residential fire sprinklers. 

 

4.         All habitable structures will require an engineered foundation system. Such engineered foundation system designs shall be based upon a site specific soils investigation. The lowest habitable floor level (basement) shall not be less than 3-feet from the seasonal high water table. Mechanical methods proposed to reduce the ground water level, unless it is a response after construction, must be proposed on a development wide basis.

 

5.         Passive radon mitigation measures shall be included in construction of residential structures on these lots. The results of a radon detection test conducted in new dwellings once the structure is enclosed but prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall be submitted to the Building Department. As an alternative, a builder may present a prepaid receipt from a radon tester which specifies that a test will be done within 30-days. A permanent certificate of occupancy can be issued when the prepaid receipt is submitted.

 

Staff also recommends approval of the appeals to Sections 8.14.2.N and 8.14.2.S of the Larimer County Land Use Code.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consent agenda, as published above.

 

Motion carried 2-0.

 

5.         GLACIER VIEW MEADOWS 7TH FILLING SHAVANO COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION, FILE #10-S2937:  This is a request to vacate a portion of Shavano Court in Glacier View Meadows 7th Filing. Three lots on either side of Shavano Court have been combined and the subject property is the only property with an address on Shavano Court. Three other properties can be accessed via Shavano Court; however, those properties also receive access off of Green Mountain Drive or Maroon Bells Court.

 

Lot 44, Glacier View Meadows 7th Filing does have utilities at the back of the lot adjacent to Shavano Court. Currently a utility easement provides access to those utilities and the applicants are not proposing to vacate any easements at this time.

 

One neighbor objected to this application via mail, indicating that Shavano Court is the only road access the HOA property for residents. However, staff found that the HOA property does have road frontage on Green Mountain Drive but chosen not to develop this access. Currently, Shavano Court does provide an established access to the HOA property.

 

Staff recommends approval of the Glacier View Meadows 7th Filing, Shavano Court Right-Of-Way Vacation, file #10-S2937, subject to the conditions listed below:

 

1.         Prior to recording the Findings and Resolution, the applicant shall provide a new legal description or exhibit of the apparent curve of Maroon Bells Circle, a description or exhibit of any portion of Shavano Court that will remain, a description of any vacated utility easement(s), and any dedicated utility easement.

 

2.         All legal descriptions will be recorded with the Findings and Resolution for this project.

 

Chair Pro-Tem Donnelly opened the hearing to the applicants and Ray and Judy Andress addressed the Board to request approval of the application.  Mr. & Mrs. Andress stated that they would like to retain their current address and plan to keep the road as it is but would like to remove public access. 

 

Mrs. Andress stated that photos presented by staff show a pile of branches on Shavano Court that have been blocking access to the HOA property for the last 9-months, proving that the access is not utilized.

 

Chair Pro-Tem Donnelly closed the hearing to the applicants and noted there was no public comment.

 

Much discussion ensued among staff and the Board regarding whether or not to completely vacate the entire easement, including utilities, or whether to grant approval as requested.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners  approve the Glacier View Meadows 7th Filing Shavano Court Right-of-way Vacation (to vacate Shavano Court from the north ease corner of lot 43, Glacier View Meadows 7th Filing, to the end of Shavano Court to the west) file #10-S2937, subject to the conditions listed below:

 

1.         Prior to executing and recording the Findings and Resolution, the applicant shall provide new legal descriptions and exhibits of the vacated portion of Shavano Court and the retained portion of Shavano Court. The descriptions and exhibits will be attached to, and recorded with, the Findings and Resolution.

 

2.         All utility easements that exist on the property will remain as is and are not vacated or amended by this decision.

 

3.         The applicant shall provide the descriptions and exhibits within 60-days of the date of this decision.

 

Motion carried 2-0.

 

6.         LAND USE CODE AMENDMENTS REGARDING SECTIONS 9.5 & 9.6:   Larimer County Engineering proposed to make changes to Sections 9.5 and 9.6 of the adopted Land Use Code, which relate to the Transportation Capital Expansion Fees. Transportation Capital Expansion Fees are utilized to help fund the capital road improvements that are necessitated by new land uses or development.

 

Section 9.5 and 9.6 of the Larimer County Land Use Code specifies that each January the Regional and Non-Regional Transportation Capital Expansion Fees shall be updated to reflect changes in road construction costs during the previous year. The amount of the fee increase is based upon the Colorado Department of Transportation regional cost index found in the annual Colorado Construction Cost Index Report. Since there are several cost indexes found in the report, staff recommends amending Sections 9.5.6.C.2 & 9.6.7.C.2 to clarify the specific index that shall be used. In addition, staff is proposing to change the month that the fee increase will be evaluated and the month that any updated fees will go into effect. 

 

The Engineering staff believes that the requested changes are minor in nature and may be considered “housekeeping” items.

 

The proposed amendments to Section 9.5.6.C.2 are as follows:

 

During the month of January January February of each year, the fees in the Road Fee Schedule shall be updated by the fee administrator to reflect changes in road construction costs during the previous year. The updated fees shall become effective on the first day of March March April. To calculate an updated Fee, each fee in the Road Fee Schedule shall be multiplied by a ratio, the numerator of which is the most recently available most recently available annual two-year moving average of of  in the annual annual Colorado Construction Cost I index Report prepared by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the denominator of which is the same index for a period one year earlier than the numerator. If the ratio is less than, or equal to 1.05, the fees in the Road Fee Schedule shall be updated by the fee administrator without further action by the county commissioners. If the ratio is greater than 1.05, the fee administrator shall report the ratio to the county commissioners, and the county commissioners shall determine the ratio that shall be used to update the fees. All obligations to pay the non-regional road capital expansion fee shall apply to the most recent update of the fees in the Road Fee Schedule.

 

The proposed amendments to Section 9.6.7.C.2 are as follows:

 

During the month of January January February of each year, the fees in the Road Fee Schedule shall be updated by the fee administrator to reflect changes in road construction costs during the previous year. The updated fees shall become effective on the first day of March March April. To calculate an updated Fee, each fee in the Road Fee Schedule shall be multiplied by a ratio, the numerator of which is the most recently available most recently available annual two-year moving average ofof  in the annual annual Colorado Construction Cost I index Report prepared by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the denominator of which is the same index for a period one year earlier than the numerator. If the ratio is less than, or equal to 1.05, the fees in the Road Fee Schedule shall be updated by the fee administrator without further action by the county commissioners. If the ratio is greater than 1.05, the fee administrator shall report the ratio to the county commissioners, and the county commissioners shall determine the ratio that shall be used to update the fees. All obligations to pay the regional road capital expansion fee shall apply to the most recent update of the fees shown in the Road Fee Schedule.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the amendments to Sections 9.5.6.C.2 and 9.6.7.C.2 as they appear above.

 

Motion carried 2-0.

 

There being no further items, the Board adjourned at 4:00 p.m.

 

TUESDAY, MARCH 16, 2010

 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

 

The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. with Neil Gluckman, Assistant County Manager. Chair Johnson presided and Commissioners Donnelly and Gaiter were present. Also present were:  Donna Hart and Deni LaRue, Commissioners’ Office; John Gamlin and Lorenda Volkner, Department of Human Resources; Joni Friedman, Workforce Center; Linda Connors, County Attorney’s Office; and Melissa Lohry, Deputy Clerk.

 

1.         APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 8, 2010: 

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the minutes for the week of March 8, 2010.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

2.         REVIEW OF THE SCHEDULE FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 22, 2010:   Ms. Hart reviewed the upcoming schedule with the Board.

 

3.         CONSENT AGENDA:

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Donnelly moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the consent agenda, as it appears below:

 

ABATEMENTS:   As proposed by the County Assessor, the following Petitions for Abatement were presented for approval:  Cortina Real Estate; William D. Walters; Antonio R. & Michelle R. Gregov; Advance Tank & Construction Company; Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust; 1225 Redwood Drive LLC; & Zer Inc.

 

03162010A001           AGREEMENT FOR SOFTWARE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR LARIMER COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS BY AND BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SQUAREI TECHNOLOGIES INC.

 

03162010D001           DEED OF DEDICATION, PTARMIGAN ACQUISITION LLC – COUNTY ROAD 32E

 

03162010D002           DEED OF DEDICATION, JAMES K. MERRITT & KATHY J. MERRITT – COUNTY ROAD 32E

 

03162010R001           FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 1-5 OF THE JACKSON PLACE SUBDIVISION

 

03162010R002           FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF AN AREA OF COUNTY ROAD 9 RIGHT-OF-WAY IN COTTONWOOD FARMS

 

03162010R003           FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE HIAWATHA HEIGHTS LOTS 15 & 16, BLOCK 31, AND LOT 5, BLOCK 30, LOT CONSOLIDATION AND FEE APPEAL

 

03162010R004           FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2 OF PARADISE VALLEY ESTATES

 

03162010R005           RESOLUTION REGARDING EXTENSION OF APPROVAL, FORT COLLINS INDUSTRIAL PARK 1ST FILING, LOT 1 AMENDED PLAT TIME EXTENSION

 

MISCELLANEOUS:   Impact Assistance Grant – Great Outdoors Colorado; Impact Assistance Grant – Department of Wildlife; Statewide Strategic Use Funds Grant Proposal.

 

LIQUOR LICENSES:  The Rock Inn – Hotel & Restaurant – Estes Park; Sundance Trail Guest Ranch – Retail Liquor Store – Red Feather Lakes; Vern’s Place – Beer & Wine – LaPorte; and Wolverine Farm Publishing – Special Event 6% – Fort Collins.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

4.         LEGISLATIVE UPDATE:  Mr. Gluckman presented a letter to the Board expressing the county’s support of Senate Bill 10-098, “Concerning the Allocation of Moneys to Promote Conservation of the State’s Natural Resources,” and requested Chair Johnson’s signature.

 

The Board voiced their approval of the letter and agreed to lend their support for the bill.

 

Mr. Gluckman also provided updates on other pending legislation.

 

5.         COUNTY MANAGER WORKSESSION:  Mr. Gluckman informed the Board that representatives of the Poudre River Library District would be giving a presentation at an upcoming Administrative Matters meeting.

 

6.         COMMISSIONER ACTIVITY REPORTS:  The Board detailed their attendance at events during the previous week.

 

7.         LARIMER COUNTY FACILITATION PROGRAM:   Mr. Gluckman provided the Board a brief overview of the county’s internal Facilitation Program.  He informed the Board that the county currently has 20-employees trained in the facilitation process, and since the program’s inception in 1998, those trained employees have facilitated nearly 150 incidents.

 

Mr. Gamlin, Ms. Volkner, Ms. Friedman, and Ms. LaRue, members of the Facilitation Team, all recounted facilitations they had been involved with and the ways in which they have been impacted through the facilitation program.

 

Chair Johnson thanked the members of the Facilitation Team and encouraged them to continue their service.

 

8.         PUBLIC COMMENT:  Emily Truforis from Go21 addressed the Board and requested the Board’s written support of federal bill HR 1806.

 

Chair Johnson thanked Ms. Truforis for appearing before the Board and assured her that the Board would further research the HR 1806 bill.

 

9.         LEGAL MATTERS:  Commissioner Johnson requested the Board go into executive session for conferences with the attorney, as described in 24-6-402(4)(b) C.R.S. (affidavit provided)

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioners Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners go into executive session for conferences with an attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions, as outlined in 24-6-402(4)(b) C.R.S.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

There being no further items, the Board recessed at 10:15 a.m.

 

 

ABATEMENT HEARING

 

The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 1:00 p.m. for an abatement hearing. Chair Johnson presided and Commissioners Donnelly and Gaiter were present. Also present were:  Jody Masters, Ann Sepulveda, and Brooke Walser, Assessor’s Office.

 

ABATEMENT HEARING FOR AUDRA SIEWERT:   Ms. Walser detailed the subject property and location. She then detailed the comparables used to arrive at the recommended value of $274,602, for the 2008 tax year.

 

Ms. Siewert stated that her property should only be valued at $204,000 because a much larger property directly across the street from her sold recently sold for only $230,000.

 

Ms. Walser explained that assessments for the 2009 tax year must be based on sales from June 30, 2004, through June 30, 2008.

 

Ms. Siewert stated that she purchased her property for $260, 000 on June 30, 2004; therefore, the value of the property should be no more than the purchase price.

 

Ms. Walser explained that even though the property was purchased within the above stated timeframe, the price must be time-adjusted according to statute.

 

Commissioner Donnelly stated that because Ms. Siewert purchased the property within the allotted assessment period, he felt it should only be valued at the purchase price.

 

Chair Johnson and Commissioner Gaiter voiced their belief that the assessed price must be time adjusted to reflect the state of the market over the entire time period because the sale occurred at the very beginning of the statutory timeframe.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners deny the Petition for Abatement of Taxes for Audra Siewert, Parcel Number 95174-12-022, for tax year 2009 and support the Assessor’s value of $274,602.

 

Motion carried 2-1, Commissioner Donnelly dissenting.

 

ABATEMENT HEARING FOR SUSAN M. NIELSON & JOSEPH H. SCHMITT:   Ms. Sepulveda detailed the subject property and location. She then detailed the comparables used to arrive at the recommended value of $500,000, for the 2008 and 2009 tax years. Ms. Sepulveda noted that Ms. Nielson had protested her taxes in 2007 and the County Board of Equalization reassessed her property value to $500,000; and because valuations are only conducted every odd number year, the valuation should remain at $500,000, at least for the 2008 tax year.

 

Ms. Schmitt explained that her ex-husband had allowed the property to deteriorate over the last few years and in 2008 she received an appraisal of $385,000 by a realtor; therefore, she did not believe the property was worth $500,000 in 2009. Furthermore, the property was listed for sale in 2009 for $449,000 and finally sold in January 2010, for only $429,000. Ms. Schmitt stated that the sale price is further proof that the property was not worth $500,000 in 2009 because it could not have been so radically reduced in value over just one year.

 

The Board agreed that $500,000 is a fair value for the 2008 tax year.

 

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners deny the Petition for Abatement of Taxes for Susan M. Nielson and Joseph H. Schmitt, Parcel Number 95311-07-007, for tax year 2008 and support the Assessor’s value of $500,000.

 

Motion carried 3-0.

 

Chair Johnson voiced his support of the assessed value for 2009 remaining at $500,000 because all of the comparable properties also remained at the same value for 2008 and 2009. Furthermore, Chair Johnson stated that the sale of the property in 2010 should not be considered as it occurred outside of the statutory timeline for the 2009 tax year.

 

Commissioner Gaiter stated that he was in favor of reducing the assessed value to $449,000 because that is what the applicant felt the property was worth in 2009 when it was listed for sale.

 

Commissioner Donnelley agreed with Commissioner Gaiter.

                                               

M O T I O N

 

Commissioner Gaiter moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Petition for Abatement of Taxes for Susan M. Nielson and Joseph H. Schmitt, Parcel Number 95311-07-007, for tax year 2009 and assess the value of the property at $449,000.

 

Motion carried 2-1, Chair Johnson dissenting.

 

There being no further items, the Board adjourned at 3:00 p.m.

 

 

 

 

__________________________________________

                        STEVE JOHNSON, CHAIR

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

 

 

SCOTT DOYLE

CLERK AND RECORDER

 

ATTEST:

 

­­­______________________________________

Melissa Lohry, Deputy Clerk

 

 

 

 

Background Image: Rocky Mountain National Park by Sue Burke. All rights reserved.